Aracelia is a rare variant of Araceli that peaked in 1971 and has grown less common since.
Aracelia is a girl name. In 2025 it ranked #10,187 for girl births in the United States (and #17,296 across all names), given to 9 babies. Aracelia was first reported in SSA data in 1949 and peaked in 1971 (18 births).
| Year | U.S. births | U.S. + territories | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9 | 9 | #10,187 |
| 2024 | 5 | 5 | #15,517 |
| 2023 | 7 | 7 | #12,300 |
| 2020 | 5 | 5 | #15,332 |
| 2019 | 6 | 6 | #13,996 |
| 2018 | 8 | 8 | #11,521 |
| 2016 | 6 | 6 | #14,527 |
| 2014 | 5 | 5 | #16,805 |
| 2010 | 6 | 6 | #15,156 |
| 2008 | 5 | 5 | #17,820 |
| 2006 | 5 | 5 | #17,442 |
| 2005 | 9 | 9 | #11,010 |
| 2004 | 8 | 8 | #11,736 |
| 2003 | 7 | 7 | #12,542 |
| 2000 | 5 | 5 | #15,250 |
| 1999 | 6 | 6 | #12,847 |
| 1993 | 5 | — | #13,612 |
| 1991 | 9 | — | #8,651 |
| 1989 | 10 | — | #7,488 |
| 1988 | 7 | — | #9,308 |
| 1987 | 6 | — | #9,925 |
| 1985 | 9 | — | #6,990 |
| 1984 | 6 | — | #9,218 |
| 1983 | 7 | — | #8,104 |
| 1982 | 10 | — | #6,391 |
| 1981 | 5 | — | #10,520 |
| 1980 | 12 | — | #5,566 |
| 1979 | 13 | — | #5,112 |
| 1978 | 6 | — | #8,623 |
| 1977 | 5 | — | #9,736 |
| 1976 | 9 | — | #6,074 |
| 1975 | 9 | — | #6,010 |
| 1974 | 11 | — | #5,029 |
| 1973 | 14 | — | #4,165 |
| 1972 | 7 | — | #6,598 |
| 1971 | 18 | — | #3,512 |
| 1970 | 13 | — | #4,254 |
| 1969 | 11 | — | #4,441 |
| 1968 | 6 | — | #6,293 |
| 1967 | 12 | — | #3,856 |
| 1966 | 11 | — | #3,971 |
| 1965 | 9 | — | #4,512 |
| 1964 | 10 | — | #4,371 |
| 1963 | 14 | — | #3,472 |
| 1962 | 6 | — | #5,889 |
| 1961 | 11 | — | #4,021 |
| 1960 | 13 | — | #3,520 |
| 1959 | 11 | — | #3,833 |
| 1958 | 8 | — | #4,534 |
| 1957 | 10 | — | #3,948 |
| 1956 | 13 | — | #3,332 |
| 1955 | 13 | — | #3,228 |
| 1954 | 5 | — | #5,784 |
| 1952 | 5 | — | #5,591 |
| 1951 | 5 | — | #5,445 |
| 1949 | 5 | — | #5,277 |